足不出户 走遍全世界
当前位置: 主页 > 未解之谜 > 世界之谜
更新时间:2026-08-26   来源:互联网   编辑:建丁邓卓  点击数: 59413次  

二次初恋

US Pentagon official’s Manila speech exposes alliance fragility, with Philippines likely to bear costs of provocations: Chinese expert_我的网站

申通

一 |     

Illustration: Liu Rui/GT
    Illustration: Liu Rui/GTUS Pentagon official Elbridge Colby's latest Manila speech, in which he called on allies to "invest more" in their own defense and stressed that Washington wants "partners, not protectorates," has drawn attention from some Philippine media. Colby's claims also expose the fragility of the Manila-Washington alliance and Washington's push to enlist "Indo-Pacific" allies in serving its own strategic interests, a Chinese expert said, warning that the Philippines, by placing itself on the front line of provocations against China, risks being a geopolitical pawn left to bear the consequences on its own.
While delivering a speech at the Stratbase Institute in Manila, Philippines, on Monday, Colby, the Under Secretary of War for Policy, laid out the US' so-called "flexible realism" approach to the Indo-Pacific, stressing that the US is "definitely not disengaging from Asia" but strengthening its forward posture and seeking to build a "denial defense" along the First Island Chain, according to a transcript of the speech released on the US Department of War website.
At the same time, he called on US allies and partners to step up, invest more in their own defense, and take responsibility for their own sovereign security. "We are looking for partners, not protectorates," Colby claimed.
The claims have drawn attention from some Philippine media outlets, with some linking them to the South China Sea issue. However, the transcript of Colby's speech showed that he did not mention China, the Global Times found. 
A Manila Bulletin report noted that after calling on allies to invest more in defense, Colby cited the Philippines as an example of the "kind of partner Washington wants to work with." He praised Manila for "strengthening its military and coast guard capabilities while deepening operational cooperation with the US" amid what the report described as China's "aggression" in the South China Sea.
Colby's visit to Manila marked his first official trip to Southeast Asia as an undersecretary under the Trump administration. He is scheduled to travel from Manila to Jakarta, Indonesia; Bangkok, Thailand; and Phnom Penh, Cambodia, said the report.
Meanwhile, a Manila Standard report interpreted Colby's remarks as showing that "the US is working closely with the Philippines" to strengthen Manila's military capabilities and protect its sovereign rights in the South China Sea, despite the fact that Colby did not mention China in his speech.
The US appears to be adopting a more retrenchment-style approach, shifting from leading directly to relying on regional allies to take the frontline role while providing support. This approach allows Washington to advance its interests while lowering its own costs, Song Zhongping, a Chinese military affairs expert, told the Global Times.
Song noted that Washington seeks to use repeated maritime frictions to tie down Chinese resources, which helps explain Colby's praise for Manila: the Philippines bears part of Washington's strategic burden while receiving largely rhetorical US support.
A South China Morning Post report on Tuesday noted that Colby avoided mentioning the recent disputes over Huangyan Dao, despite Washington having criticized China's establishment of a nature reserve there just two days earlier. The report described the omission as a "measured tone" ahead of a potential meeting between the Chinese and US leaders.
Washington's primary concern is its own interests. At the core of its "Indo-Pacific strategy" is strengthening its alliance network by pushing partners such as the Philippines to shoulder greater security burdens in pursuit of US strategic goals. As US-China diplomatic dynamics evolve, countries serving as Washington's geopolitical spearheads in confrontations with China risk being left behind, said some observers.
Song noted that this also reveals the fragility of the US-Philippine relationship.
The US has encouraged the Philippines to take the front line in confrontations with China while offering mostly rhetorical support. Should tensions escalate, Manila would bear much of the cost on its own, said the expert. 
。    
哈里王子和梅根·马克尔这对颇具争议的夫妇,刚刚结束了他们的尼日利亚之旅。
尽管英国外交和联邦事务部的消息人士证实,哈里和梅根是“以私人身份访问尼日利亚”,英国政府“没有参与安排或促进他们的计划”,但很容易发现,他们就是以王室成员的身份来完成这次旅行的。
对此资深的王室专家汤姆·奎因(Tom Quinn)在当地时间5月16日称,哈梅的“伪王室之旅”让国王查尔斯三世和威尔士亲王威廉感到“非常愤怒”。

二 |

“你对正式王室访问的期待都在那里,招待会、参观学校和慈善机构、伤兵和残疾人,“汤姆·奎因这样解释说道,“梅根和哈里的演讲以及他们的整个态度都是为了给人一种印象,即他们仍然是在任的高级王室成员,这激怒了威廉和他的父亲,他们一点儿也不喜欢。”
按照汤姆的说法,梅根哈里现在已经有些“耍无赖”的意思了,即“我们不需要你们的许可仍然可以是王室成员,无论何时何地,我们都会按照自己的想法去做事情。”
哈梅当初闹“梅脱”,就是因为无法忍受王室的条条框框,进而想出了“半进半退”的方法,即想履行职责的时候就出现,不想的时候就任由他们折腾,但这样的想法遭到了当时还在世的女王的否定。
最初到美国时,梅根哈里摆出一副“我们不愿意当什么王室成员”的架势,却也靠着消费王室牟利。但很快这条路就行不通了,观众看清了他们“伪受害者”的嘴脸,那些名人更是迅速地远离他们。
既然赚钱的道路即将被堵死,那就索性耍无赖吧,“我们就说自己代表王室,你们还能把我们怎么样?”
据消息人士透露称,梅根哈里自认为此次尼日利亚之行很成功,他们计划在今年还要继续这样的“伪王室之旅”,而目的地仍然是非洲国家。
“他们将会在未来几周分享尼日利亚之行的细节,”知情人士这样说,“之后他们绝对有可能返回非洲进行更多巡演。”
自称拥有43%尼日利亚血统的梅根,的确在当地被高看了一等,但问题是,如果她没有那个苏塞克斯公爵夫人的头衔,估计也没有人会把她当回事儿吧。
既然查尔斯和威廉感到“非常愤怒”了,他们会想办法应对吗?
有评论认为,对于硬要耍无赖的人,王室方面还真是挺头疼的,就算剥夺了他们的头衔,但哈里是查尔斯儿子这件事也是无法改变的,国王的儿子不就是王室成员嘛。
有很多英国网友指出,说到底还是媒体给予了哈梅太多的关注,虽说评论区里对他们的“骂声”一片,但那种铺天盖地的宣传,让人们想忽略他们都难。这也是哈梅如此高调的原因,何况真有非洲国家喜欢他们呢。

Current article:http://rucrhxo.dingruorenhongqiaminmeipeiliu.cyou/1x6dmf/20260826/39709.html

Published on:08:15:23


关于奇站|联系我们|网站地图|网站地图|征稿启事|意见反馈|免责声明|法律声明|版权声明|不良信息举报

Copyright @ 2020-2099 二次初恋网站版权所有